Glueboot
Karnality InKarnate

Thursday, February 02, 2006

The question then....

Since beginning a little project that myself and a few others have been working on (which is going really well due to the amount of interesting people getting involved) I and others have been coming under attack from various parties who make no attempt to talk to anyone in the project but who just seek to attack it, I can only assume that it is from jealousy or ignorance. I do not feel the need to justify myself to them because I do not care about them. However, I often wonder who they really are. Not just their names, but what makes them tick.

The question then.... who are the men (99.9% are men I believe, I rarely come across women so caught up in ressentiment, but then there are few women in philosophy)... WHO, I ask, are the men who hide behind these attacks?

GLUEBOOT INVESTIGATES

1) Bad psychologists: I believe that what strikes at the heart of such people is our lack of a thesis. Metaphor is an incredibly difficult concept for such people to grasp, so are the vast majority of concepts in the Western Tradition. Nevertheless, they also appear to attack our little plan due to the public nature of such a thing. Despite their money and their apparent academic credibility they have been unable to spark such interest in their own, unbelievably worthwhile and interesting, project. These people usually start their lives at Oxbridge and end them as bureaucrats.

2) The "Dionysian" Ones: These followers of the so-called transgressive philosophers make a virtue of affirmation and discord. Not an unworthy thing in itself. However, having met a number of readers of these philosophers I can only conclude from rigorous investigations that the most transgressive thing they have done is wank over a copy of "Beyond Good and Evil," spewing their hot semen all over Nietzsche's pages, all the while summoning dionysus into being, but ending up with Dot Cotten. Indeed, I do believe that their highest affirmation is the rather vocal saying "No" to anything that does not meet their standard (Despite their need for diversity their standard is always the same). These people usually start their life masturbating alone in their room, and they end their life (after many heartbreaks) the same way.


I shall continue these investigations and will publish the results of this highly scientific research forthwith. Any information that would be of use would be much appreciated.

posted at 12:42 am by Siobhan

|



Archives

March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
September 2006
July 2007
September 2007



Pages I like


Deleuze and Guattari on the Web

Cinestatic

MediaLens

Mr Agreeable

Radical Philosophy

Textz

The Portadown News

Whore Cull

Xvans Experientialism


Blogs I Read


86400seconds

An Idiots Guide to Dreaming

And So This is Christmas

Arqueslodia do corpa

bat

blissblog

Charlotte Street

Dem Wahren, Schonen Guten

Farmer Glitch

Hyperstition

Infinite thought

k-punk

Lenin's Tomb

Long Sunday

Lombard Street

Loveecstacycrime

Old Rottenhat

Pas au-dela

Radar Anomalous

radio free narnia

Smokewriting

sphaleotas

Spurious

The Parallel Campaign

The Pinocchio Theory

sweet effay

The Weblog

White River

William Bennett




Contact me

here i am


Credits

design by maystar
powered by blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com


Listed on Blogwise