Glueboot |
| Karnality InKarnate |
|
Thursday, February 02, 2006
The question then.... Since beginning a little project that myself and a few others have been working on (which is going really well due to the amount of interesting people getting involved) I and others have been coming under attack from various parties who make no attempt to talk to anyone in the project but who just seek to attack it, I can only assume that it is from jealousy or ignorance. I do not feel the need to justify myself to them because I do not care about them. However, I often wonder who they really are. Not just their names, but what makes them tick. The question then.... who are the men (99.9% are men I believe, I rarely come across women so caught up in ressentiment, but then there are few women in philosophy)... WHO, I ask, are the men who hide behind these attacks? GLUEBOOT INVESTIGATES 1) Bad psychologists: I believe that what strikes at the heart of such people is our lack of a thesis. Metaphor is an incredibly difficult concept for such people to grasp, so are the vast majority of concepts in the Western Tradition. Nevertheless, they also appear to attack our little plan due to the public nature of such a thing. Despite their money and their apparent academic credibility they have been unable to spark such interest in their own, unbelievably worthwhile and interesting, project. These people usually start their lives at Oxbridge and end them as bureaucrats. 2) The "Dionysian" Ones: These followers of the so-called transgressive philosophers make a virtue of affirmation and discord. Not an unworthy thing in itself. However, having met a number of readers of these philosophers I can only conclude from rigorous investigations that the most transgressive thing they have done is wank over a copy of "Beyond Good and Evil," spewing their hot semen all over Nietzsche's pages, all the while summoning dionysus into being, but ending up with Dot Cotten. Indeed, I do believe that their highest affirmation is the rather vocal saying "No" to anything that does not meet their standard (Despite their need for diversity their standard is always the same). These people usually start their life masturbating alone in their room, and they end their life (after many heartbreaks) the same way. I shall continue these investigations and will publish the results of this highly scientific research forthwith. Any information that would be of use would be much appreciated. |
Archives March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 April 2005 May 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 March 2006 April 2006 May 2006 September 2006 July 2007 September 2007
Pages I like
Deleuze and Guattari on the Web Cinestatic MediaLens Mr Agreeable Radical Philosophy Textz The Portadown News Whore Cull Xvans Experientialism
Blogs I Read
86400seconds An Idiots Guide to Dreaming And So This is Christmas Arqueslodia do corpa bat blissblog Charlotte Street Dem Wahren, Schonen Guten Farmer Glitch Hyperstition Infinite thought k-punk Lenin's Tomb Long Sunday Lombard Street Loveecstacycrime Old Rottenhat Pas au-dela Radar Anomalous radio free narnia Smokewriting sphaleotas Spurious The Parallel Campaign The Pinocchio Theory sweet effay The Weblog White River William Bennett
Contact me
here i am
Credits
design by maystar powered by blogger |